News
Consumer rights victory as US ends opposition to GM labelling guidelines
05 Jul 2011
Consumer rights victory as US ends opposition to GM
labelling guidelines
- Twenty year struggle within global food safety body
ends with 'consumer rights milestone'
- Move clears way for greater monitoring of the effects
of GM organisms
Consumers International (CI) and its member organisations celebrated victory
today as regulators from more than 100 countries agreed on long
overdue guidance on the labelling of genetically
modified (GM) food.
The Codex
Alimentarius Commission, made up of the world's food safety
regulatory agencies, has been labouring for two decades to come up
with consensus guidance on this topic.

No legal opposition to GM labelling
In a striking reversal of their previous position, on Tuesday,
during the annual Codex summit in Geneva, the US delegation dropped
its opposition to the GM labelling guidance document, allowing it
to move forward and become an official Codex text.
The new Codex agreement means that any country wishing to adopt
GM food labelling will no longer face the threat of a legal
challenge from the World Trade Organization (WTO). This is because
national measures based on Codex guidance or standards cannot be
challenged as a barrier to trade.
This will have immediate implications for consumers. Edita
Vilcapoma of the
Peruvian consumer group ASPEC, representing Consumers
International at the Codex meeting in Geneva, said:
"Peru's recent introduction of GM food labelling faced the
threat of a legal challenge from the WTO. This new Codex agreement
now means that this threat has gone and the consumer right to be
informed has been secured. This is major victory for the global
consumer movement."
GM health monitoring
The agreement also recognises the enormous health monitoring
benefits of giving consumers transparent information about the
presence of GM
foods. Consumers International's lead delegate at Codex, and a
senior scientist at Consumers Union of the United States, Dr
Michael Hansen, stated:
"We are particularly pleased that the new guidance
recognises that GM labelling is justified as a tool
for post market monitoring. This is one of the key reasons we want
all GM foods to be required to be labelled - so
that if consumers eat modified foods, they will be able to know and
report to regulators if they have an allergic or other adverse
reaction."
African consumers for GM labelling
The labelling milestone is particularly welcomed by CI member organisations
in Africa, who have been fighting on behalf of their consumers
for the right to be informed about GM food. Samuel Ochieng,
President Emeritus of Consumers International and CEO of the
Consumer Information Network of Kenya said:
"While the agreement falls short of the consumer movement's
long-held demand for endorsement of mandatory GM food labelling,
this is still a significant milestone for consumer rights. We
congratulate Codex on agreeing on this guidance, which has been
sought by consumers and regulators in African countries for nearly
twenty years. This guidance is extremely good news for the worlds'
consumers who want to know what is in the foods on their
plates".
comments powered by